목차
Preface i
Executive summary ii
Abbreviations iv
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. Purpose of the research 1
1.2. Research approach 1
1.3. Structure of the report 2
Chapter 2. Doctrine as a tool for the management of complexity 3
2.1. Doctrine provides guidance for military planning at different levels of granularity 3
2.2. The primary function of modern military doctrine is to provide the means to achieve strategic goals 4
2.3. Doctrine can help to manage organisational complexity across multiple domains and Services 4
2.4. Doctrine sets out general principles governing how a military force is intended to operate 5
2.5. Doctrine helps other government agencies or civil society to better understand the military and formalises civilian–military relations 6
2.6. Doctrine should not be prescriptive about TTPs 6
2.7. Doctrine can help manage technological innovation by providing a standard through which novel capabilities can be assessed 7
2.8. Doctrine can also facilitate the preservation, review and dissemination of lessons learned 7
2.9. Conclusion 8
Chapter 3. Understanding doctrine in the Ukrainian context 9
3.1. The Ukrainian model of joint warfare has emerged organically in wartime and codified doctrine can help preserve and iterate it 9
3.2. Codified operational doctrine can help to preserve and iterate existing structures for capturing lessons learned 10
3.3. NATO doctrine and doctrine development processes are not directly applicable to Ukraine’s operational circumstances 11
3.4. Ukraine requires a distinctive form of doctrine which reflects and takes into account its unique circumstances 13
3.5. Conclusion 14
Chapter 4. Towards a new Ukrainian doctrine system 15
4.1. Objectives for a future Ukrainian doctrine system 15
4.2. Recommendations for immediate action 19
References 21
Annex A. The evolution of Ukrainian doctrine 24
