로그아웃 하시겠습니까?

  • 주제별 국가전략
  • 전체

The Brazilian pension system under an equity lens : technical note
(공평성의 관점에서 본 브라질 연금 제도)

목차

Title page

Contents

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3

1. INTRODUCTION 7

2. OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM AND THE IMPACT OF 2019 REFORM 12

3. EQUITY IN THE BRAZILIAN NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM 19

3.1. Differences in the duration of benefit receipt 22

3.2. The interaction of minimum pension level with contribution period requirements 29

3.3. Contribution rate differences and the role of taxation 37

3.4. Judicialization of benefit eligibility 42

4. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS 46

REFERENCES 51

ANNEX 1. REGIONAL DIMENSIONS OF AGING AND PENSION COVERAGE 52

Table 1. Number of RGPS and social assistance benefits paid by INSS in 2021 13

Table 2. Number of RGPS contributors and active beneficiaries, 2020 14

Table 3. RGPS and BPC retirement plans and benefit eligibility requirements (2023) 23

Table 4. Duration of benefit discontinued in 2019 and average value of benefits in 2021 26

Table 5. Eligibility thresholds and benefit amounts in poverty prevention programs for the elderly (BPC) and general population (Bolsa Familia), 2023 32

Table 6. Tax regime and social insurance coverage 38

Table 7. Treatment of pensions and pensioners under personal income tax and social security contributions 41

Table 8. Summary of proposed reforms and their impact on equity 49

Table 9. Characteristics of individual profiles used in figure 21 50

Figure 1. Cash expenditure on old-age and survivors' benefits: public schemes for OECD (2017) and Brazil (2019) 8

Figure 2. Old-age dependency ratio (65+/20-64): Brazil and high income country index 9

Figure 3. Overview of the Brazilian social security system 14

Figure 4. Urban (left) versus rural (right) RGPS revenues and benefits (2016-2022), in % of GDP 16

Figure 5. Projected revenues, expenditures, and deficits of RGPS 17

Figure 6. 'New 65' retirement age required to keep old age dependency rates constant 17

Figure 7. Nine elements affecting equity in the pension system 19

Figure 8. Share of workers retiring with different RGPS and BPC pensions 24

Figure 9. Number of urban pensions by length of contribution granted, by beneficiary's age group 25

Figure 10. Number of urban pensions by length of contribution granted, by sex of the insured, according to age groups 25

Figure 11. Terminated benefits as a share of total pension benefits in 2019 by age group (retirement by age benefits) 27

Figure 12. Statutory retirement ages for females and males in OECD and LAC countries 28

Figure 13. Share of RGPS and BPC pension benefits granted that are equal to minimum pension 31

Figure 14. Length of contribution periods of beneficiaries who retired with a minimum pension benefit in 2018 32

Figure 15. Internal rate of return by decile of contributions made for urban retirees with a minimum pension benefit in 2018 33

Figure 16. Consolidating the components of old-age pensions (BPC and rural pension) and the prorated minimum contributory pension guarantee 35

Figure 17. Noncontributory pension levels in OECD and LAC countries, in comparison with income per capita 36

Figure 18. Tax regime by income deciles 40

Figure 19. Evolution of benefit assignment by courts 43

Figure 20. Evolution of total value of benefits assigned through courts 45

Figure 21. Net present value of lifetime contributions and pension benefits for select individual profiles in terms of pre-retirement wage 50

Boxes

Box 1. Selected statistics characterizing the Brazilian pension system 47

해시태그

#연금제도 # 연금개혁 # 연금재정 # 포괄적노후보장

관련자료