목차
Title page 1
Contents 4
1. Executive summary 5
2. What is behind this analysis? 6
2.1. Identification of climate actions for assessment 8
2.2. Rapid Evidence Assessment 9
2.3. Rating of climate actions 10
3. How to use this analysis 11
3.1. How to use the ratings of all climate actions 11
3.2. How to use the case studies 13
4. Analysis and key findings 13
4.1. CA11; Active habitat management to increase resilience - a low/no regret natural resources-based action 18
4.2. CA16: Soil conservation - a low/no regret natural resources-based action 19
4.3. CA5: Aim to reduce direct emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037 compared to 2017 - a low/no-regret action for the built environment 20
4.4. CA3: Passive cooling measures - a low-regret action for the built environment, with caveats 21
4.5. CA15: Suitable trees, crops, and livestock for future climate in appropriate locations - a low-regret natural resources-based action with caveats 21
4.6. CA10: At least 5 MtCO₂/yr of engineered removals by 2030 - an action with clear trade-offs 22
4.7. Caveats 23
4.8. Further research needs 25
Appendix A. Methodology 26
Appendix B. Final list of climate actions for assessment and descriptions 50
Appendix C. Evidence extraction to support rating of climate actions 54
Appendix D. Rating of climate actions based on evidence extraction only 54
Appendix E. Rating of climate actions based on evidence extraction and expert judgment to fill gaps 54
Appendix F. Literature search approach and search strings per action 55
Appendix G. Case study - soil conservation 60
Appendix H. Case study - Aim to reduce direct emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037 compared to 2017 75
Tables 15
Table 1. Main low/no-regret climate actions 15
Table 2. Climate actions with (limited) trade-offs 16
Table 3. Climate actions with clear trade-offs 17
Table 4. Elements of adaptive capacity 30
Table 5. Action specific search terms for systematic literature review 55
Appendix Figures 28
Figure 1. Scope of assessment (Solid dark blue in scope. White/pink out of scope.) 28
Figure 2. Impact chain flow diagram 30
Figure 3. Flow chart of the search process 39
