목차
Title page
Contents
Abstract 4
Acknowledgements 4
Key findings 6
1. Introduction 8
Background 8
Rationale, purpose and structure of the report 8
2. Application of the Q Methodology to the project 9
The Q Methodology 9
The Q exercise 10
Glossary 12
3. Main findings from the Q exercise 13
Type 1 - Improve governance processes and foster innovation 13
Type 2 - Serve citizens and ensure accountability 14
Type 3 - Pragmatic and critical 15
Type 4 - Control and master 17
"Consensus statements" and "disagreement statements" 18
4. Implications for Regulatory Policy 2.0 19
Notes 21
References 22
Annex A. Factor compositions and relationships 24
Annex B. Summary table: concourse and scores for each of the four types 26
Table 1. Belief systems (or "Types") regarding Better Regulation 6
Figure 2.1. The Q Methodology score-sheet 11
Boxes
Box 2.1. The Q methodology in practice: typical steps 9
Box 2.2. The questions raised in the 2021 Issues Paper 10
Annex Tables
Table A.1. Typology loadings 24
Table A.2. Correlations between factor scores 25
Table B.1. Summary table 26
해시태그
AI 요약·번역 서비스
인공지능이 자동으로 요약·번역한 내용입니다.
Regulatory policy 2.0 : viewpoints and beliefs about Better Regulation : a report from the "Q exercise"
(규제 정책 2.0)