목차
Title page
Contents
Abstract 3
1. Introduction 4
2. Design 6
2.1. Setting 6
2.2. Conceptual framework 7
2.3. Treatments 9
2.4. Treatment comparisons and hypotheses 10
2.5. Implementation 11
3. Results 13
3.1. Descriptives 13
3.2. Treatment effects by period 14
3.3. Heterogeneity by recycling at baseline 17
3.4. Mechanisms 18
3.5. Treatment effects over the entire intervention period 20
3.6. Intensive margin 23
4. Conclusion 23
References 26
Appendix 30
A. Balance tests and descriptive overview 30
B. Histograms of recycling frequency per period 32
C. Graphs on weekly recycling behavior 34
D. Additional analyses 35
E. Full sample results 40
Table 1. Study design overview 9
Table 2. Treatment effects on whether households recycled at least once, by period 16
Table 3. Treatment effects on whether households recycled at least once, by period - baseline recycling yes vs. no 17
Table 4. Treatment effects on recycling in period 2 and 3 combined 19
Table 5. Treatment effects on recycling over entire intervention period 22
Figure 1. Recycling propensity by reminder frequency 7
Figure 2. Proportion of households that recycled at least once per period, by treatment 14
Figure 3. Total recycling frequency during entire intervention period, by treatment 21
Table A.1. Household characteristics by group - full sample 30
Table A.2. Households that recycled at least once: old vs. recent sign-up years 30
Table A.3. Household characteristics by group - recent sign-up years 31
Table D.1. Treatment effects on whether households recycled at least once, by period (logit) 35
Table D.2. Treatment effects on how often households recycled per period 36
Table D.3. Treatment effects on how often households recycled per period - baseline recycling yes 36
Table D.4. Treatment effects on how often households recycled per period - baseline recycling no 37
Table D.5. Treatment effects on the number of bags recycled by households per period 38
Table D.6. Treatment effects on the number of bags recycled by households per period - baseline recycling yes 38
Table D.7. Treatment effects on the number of bags recycled by households per period - baseline recycling no 39
Table E.1. Treatment effects on whether households recycled at least once, by period - full sample 44
Table E.2. Treatment effects on whether households recycle at least once, by period - full sample (logit) 45
Table E.3. Treatment effects on whether households recycled at least once, by period - baseline recycling yes - full sample 46
Table E.4. Treatment effects on whether households recycled at least once, by period - baseline recycling no - full sample 46
Table E.5. Treatment effects on recycling in period 2 and 3 combined - full sample 47
Table E.6. Treatment effects on recycling in period 2 and 3 combined - baseline recycling yes - full sample 47
Table E.7. Treatment effects on recycling in period 2 and 3 combined - baseline recycling no - full sample 47
Table E.8. Treatment effects on recycling over entire intervention period - full sample 49
Table E.9. Treatment effects on how often households recycled per period - full sample 50
Table E.10. Treatment effects on how often households recycled per period - baseline recycling yes - full sample 50
Table E.11. Treatment effects on how often households recycled per period - baseline recycling no - full sample 51
Table E.12. Treatment effects on the number of bags recycled by households per period - full sample 52
Table E.13. Treatment effects on the number of bags recycled by households per period - baseline recycling yes - full sample 52
Table E.14. Treatment effects on the number of bags recycled by households per period - baseline recycling no - full sample 53
Figure B.1. Histograms of recycling frequency during the baseline period (week 1-3), comparing all treatment groups together with the control group 32
Figure B.2. Histograms of recycling frequency during period 2 (week 4-6), comparing all treatment groups together with the control group 32
Figure B.3. Histograms of recycling frequency during period 3 (week 7-9), comparing the continuous and the interrupted treatment groups with the control group 33
Figure B.4. Histograms of recycling frequency during period 4 (week 10-12), comparing the continuous, interrupted and restarted treatment groups with the control group 33
Figure C.1. Percentages of households that recycled per week 34
Figure E.1. Histograms of recycling frequency during the baseline period (week 1-3), comparing all treatment groups together with the control group - full sample 41
Figure E.2. Histograms of recycling frequency during period 2 (week 4-6), comparing all treatment groups together with the control group - full sample 41
Figure E.3. Histograms of recycling frequency during period 3 (week 7-9), comparing the continuous and the interrupted treatment groups with the control group - full sample 42
Figure E.4. Histograms of recycling frequency during period 4 (week 10-12), comparing the continuous, interrupted and restarted treatment groups with the control group - full sample 42
Figure E.5. Percentages of households that recycled per week - full sample 43
Figure E.6. Proportions of households that recycled at least once per period - full sample 44
Figure E.7. Total recycling frequency during entire intervention period, by treatment - full sample 48
해시태그
관련자료
AI 요약·번역·분석 서비스
AI를 활용한 보고서 요약·번역과 실시간 질의응답 서비스입니다.
Can reminders promote regular pro-environmental behavior? experimental evidence from Peru
(반복적 알림의 장기 친환경 행동 촉진 가능성 : 페루의 사례를 기반으로)
국가전략포털에서 실시간 AI 질의응답 서비스를 시작합니다. 4가지 유형의 요약과 번역을 이용해보시고, 보고서에 대해 추가로 알고 싶은 내용이 있으면 채팅창을 통해 자유롭게 AI에게 물어볼 수 있습니다.
※ 제공하는 정보는 참고용이며, 정확한 사실 확인이 필요할 수 있습니다. 민감한 개인정보는 입력하지 마십시오.
