목차
Title page 1
Contents 3
Executive Summary 2
Introduction 4
Report Scope 6
Guiding Questions 6
Selection Criteria 7
Limitations 7
Proposal Case Studies 8
Industry: OpenAI’s Approach to Frontier Risk 8
Civil Society: AI Now Institute's Zero Trust AI Governance 10
Academia: Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety 12
State Government: California's Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act 14
Federal Government: Framework to Mitigate AI-Enabled Extreme Risks 18
Analysis 20
Deriving Assumptions 20
Shared Assumptions 21
What Risks Are Important to Mitigate and Who Should Have Primary Oversight of Frontier AI? 22
Who Is Delegated Tasks and Able to Play a Role? 23
Would the Proposed Mechanisms or Tools Actually Achieve the Proposal's Objectives? 25
Unique Assumptions 31
Discussion 33
Conclusion 35
Authors 36
Acknowledgments 36
Appendix A: Assumption Interdependencies 37
Endnotes 38
Tables 6
Table 1. Guiding Questions 6
Table 2. Key Components of OpenAI's Approach to Frontier Risk 9
Table 3. Key Components of AI Now Institute's Zero Trust AI Governance 11
Table 4. Key Components of Academia's Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety 13
Table 5. Key Components of SB-1047 16
Table 6. Key Components of Framework to Mitigate AI-Enabled Extreme Risks 19
Table 7. Shared Assumptions About Which Risks Are Important to Mitigate and Who Should Have Primary Oversight of Frontier AI 22
Table 8. Shared Assumptions About Who is Delegated Tasks and Able to Play a Role 24
Table 9. Shared Assumptions About Which Techniques or Categories of Techniques Are Effective 26
Table 10. Shared Assumptions About Which Processes or Frameworks Are Necessary 28
Table 11. Shared Assumptions About Which Information or Actions Are Useful 30
