• 주제별 국가전략
  • 전체

Navigating the European Commission’s MFF Proposal for 2028-2034: Mapping Risks and Opportunities for Cohesion Policy and Regional Development

(유럽연합 집행위원회의 2028-2034년 MFF 제안 탐색: 결속정책과 지역발전을 위한 위험과 기회 지도화)

목차

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6

LIST OF BOXES 7

LIST OF FIGURES 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8


1. INTRODUCTION 11


2. THE 2021–2027 COHESION POLICY AND THE 2028–2034 NRPP PROPOSAL: MAPPING CONTINUITY AND CHANGE 13

2.1. Overall architecture 14

2.1.1. A more integrated planning and regulatory framework 14

2.1.2. A different allocation formula but minor changes to national envelopes 15

2.2. Objectives, earmarking and co-financing rules 16

2.2.1. Comparing the 2021-2027 CP specific objectives with the NRPPs specific

objectives 17

2.2.2. Thematic concentration and thematic earmarking rules 17

2.2.3. Geographic earmarking rules 18

2.2.4. Co-financing rules 19

2.3. Governance 19

2.3.1. Partnership principle 19

2.3.2. Planning and implementation of EU funds 20

2.4. Financial management rules and performance framework 20

2.4.1. EU payments: shift from cost-based to performance-based approach 20

2.4.2. De-commitment rule and pre-financing 21

2.5. Reforms and rule of law conditionality 21

2.5.1. Policy reforms 21

2.5.2. Rule of Law conditionality 21

2.6. Flexibility and synergies with other EU programmes 22

2.6.1. Flexibility in response to crises and emerging needs 22

2.6.2. Synergies with other EU programmes 22


3. PURSUING COHESION OBJECTIVES THROUGH THE NEW NATIONAL PLANS: RISK OF MARGINALISATION OR STRATEGIC REFRAMING? 25

3.1. Recommendation 1: Clarify the intervention logic to promote cohesion and re-formulate the Proposal’s objectives accordingly 27

3.2. Recommendation 2: Task the Commission to issue EU cohesion national recommendations to steer the preparation of the plans 27

3.3. Recommendation 3: Subject the Plans to a territorial impact assessment (TIA) 28

3.4. Recommendation 4: Clarify the meaning of “right to stay” 28


4. A MORE CENTRALISED GOVERNANCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES 30

4.1. Recommendation 5: A “legal check” accompanying the “regional check” 31

4.2. Recommendation 6: Set region-specific milestones and targets for NRPP measures in areas of exclusive regional competence 32

4.3. Recommendation 7: Guarantee predictable and timely payments to regional authorities 32


5. IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING A MORE FLEXIBLE AND INTEGRATED PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK 33

5.1. Recommendation 8: Replace the 10% rural target with a 10% earmarking to support integrated local development strategies 34

5.2. Recommendation 9: Ensure that ringfenced allocations for less developed regions support cohesion-related interventions 34

5.3. Recommendation 10: Prevent early access to the mid-term review reserve 34


6. FROM COST-BASED TO PERFORMANCE-BASED REIMBURSEMENT: IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES AND RISKS 36

6.1. Recommendation 11: Provide clear guidance and reinforced technical assistance to weaker administrations 37

6.2. Recommendation 12: Develop a methodological handbook to calculate payout values 38

6.3. Recommendation 13: Formulate milestones to support more risk-prone and experimental activities 38


7. BEYOND THE NATIONAL PLANS: COMPLEMENTARITIES AND SYNERGIES WITH THE EUROPEAN COMPETITIVENESS FUND 39

7.1. Recommendation 14: Ensure synergies between the ECF and the EU Facility 40

7.2. Recommendation 15: Reinforce the financial support for interregional innovative investment (I3) projects and incentivise the adoption of Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3) 41


8. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT IN THE ADOPTION AND MONITORING OF THE PLANS AND IN THE USE OF THE EU FACILITY 42

8.1. Recommendation 16: Enhance the EP´s capacity to oversee the implementation of the Plans 43

8.2. Recommendation 17: Give more time to the Parliament and the Council to revise delegated acts 43

8.3. Recommendation 18: Guarantee sufficient involvement of the EP in decisions over the mobilisation of the EU Facility 43


9. CONCLUDING REMARKS 45

9.1. Policy recommendations 46


REFERENCES 48


ANNEX I. COMPARING THE 2021-2027 AND 2028-2034 LEGAL BASIS FOR COHESION POLICY 50

ANNEX II. COMPARING THE 28 FUND’S SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES WITH THOSE OF THE 2021-2027 COHESION POLICY FUNDS 68

ANNEX III. THE TERRITORIAL DIMENSION OF THE FUND´S 28 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES UNDER PILLAR “PROSPERITY” AND “SECURITY AND DEFENCE” 76

해시태그

#유럽기금 #MFF #결속정책 #NRPP #공동관리기금

관련자료

AI 요약·번역·분석 서비스

AI를 활용한 보고서 요약·번역과 실시간 질의응답 서비스입니다.

Navigating the European Commission’s MFF Proposal for 2028-2034: Mapping Risks and Opportunities for Cohesion Policy and Regional Development

(유럽연합 집행위원회의 2028-2034년 MFF 제안 탐색: 결속정책과 지역발전을 위한 위험과 기회 지도화)

번역 PDF 파일의 원문 형태 그대로 번역

국가전략포털에서 실시간 AI 질의응답 서비스를 시작합니다. 4가지 유형의 요약과 번역을 이용해보시고, 보고서에 대해 추가로 알고 싶은 내용이 있으면 채팅창을 통해 자유롭게 AI에게 물어볼 수 있습니다.

※ 제공하는 정보는 참고용이며, 정확한 사실 확인이 필요할 수 있습니다. 민감한 개인정보는 입력하지 마십시오.