목차
Title page 1
Contents 1
Executive summary 1
1. Introduction 2
2. What is 'better regulation'? 2
3. Why is the better-regulation system still perceived as falling short? 3
3.1. The volume of legislation continues to increase 4
3.2. Major proposals are increasingly accompanied by impact assessments but there are significant exceptions 5
3.3. The quality of analysis is variable 7
3.4. Efforts to improve the legislative stock are falling short 7
4. Policy recommendations 8
4.1. Recommendation 1: legislative flow 8
4.2. Recommendation 2: assessment throughout the legislative process 9
4.3. Recommendation 3: assessment of delegated and implementing acts 9
4.4. Recommendation 4: professionalisation through establishing a centre of analytical expertise 9
4.5. Recommendation 5: streamlining and simplifying analytical requirements 12
4.6. Recommendation 6: externalisation of ex-post evaluations 12
References 13
Tables 4
Table 1. Commission proposals and adopted acts under ordinary legislative procedure 4
Table 2. Delegated and implementing acts under ordinary legislative procedure 4
Table 3. Commission proposals and impact assessments 5
Boxes 6
Box 1. Why the quality of impact assessments matters: the example of 'Omnibus I' 6
Box 2. Examples of impact assessments based on a comprehensive and consistent analytical framework 10
